Something for Nothing: Why Doing Nothing Can be a Potent Persuasion Tool


 By Steve MartinStrength

For nearly seventy years scientists who study the persuasion process have consistently revealed a simple, yet remarkable truth; when it comes to effectively influencing others, small changes can make a big difference.

Examples abound, from the subtle adjustments made to a meeting room environment that lead to improved business outcomes to the addition of an extra option that spawns disproportionate responses to an offer. In the case of adding an extra option, it is interesting to note new research that suggests, in certain contexts, the additional option to an offer doesn’t even have to be substantive.

Simply offering people the option to ‘do nothing’ can have a surprising influence on how committed they subsequently become to that choice over time.

In the latest issue of Psychological Science, Wharton Business School Professor Rom Schrift and his Georgia State University colleague Jeffrey Parker describe a series of experiments designed to test the influence that a ‘do nothing’ option had on people’s commitment to a task.

In one study participants were asked to identify as many words as possible from one of two word-search puzzles. One contained the names of famous actors and the other, capital cities. Everyone in the study was told that they would be paid for each correctly identified word and could quit the task at any time. They were then assigned to one of three conditions:

word search

1) Forced-choice:  here, participants were asked to choose which of the word puzzles they would work on — capital cities or famous actors

2) Rejectable-choice:  here, participants were asked to choose which of the word puzzles they would work on and also offered a third option which was to choose neither topic and not participate further in the study. In other words choose to ‘do nothing’.

3) Forced-choice with three topics:  here, study participants were given the option to choose from three topics — famous actors, capital cities, or famous ballet dancers. This last topic was considered an unappealing option as the researchers figured that, compared to actors and cities, most people would be unfamiliar with ballet dancers.

The results showed that there was no difference in the amount of time that participants spent on the task in the forced-choice conditions (1 and 3 above). However those given the option to choose one of two word puzzles or alternatively ‘do nothing’ spent much longer on the task once they had chosen it. In other words the small act of including a ‘do nothing’ option increased participants’ commitment to the task by, on average over 40 per cent.

At first glance, the idea of adding a ‘do nothing’ option seems nonsensical. Unlike the adding of an extra topic which increased the puzzles on offer from two to three, the inclusion of a ‘do nothing’ option didn’t substantively add to the puzzles available. But this misses a crucial point; the option to ‘do nothing’ is not considered simply as an additional alternative.   Instead it reinforces in the mind of the individual who does make a choice that their chosen path is a good one. If it wasn’t then, he or she would surely have opted out.

As Schrift and Parker point out, this feature is unique to no-choice options. As odd as it may first sound, adding the ‘do nothing’ option serves to boost an individual’s commitment to the choice they make which, in turn, increases their commitment and persistence to complete it.

april iir graph

But won’t adding a ‘do nothing’ option be risky? Surely it also increases the chances that some individuals will do just that? Of course this could be true. However, in some instances it may still prove to be a beneficial strategy, especially if the benefit gained by the increased commitment of those who do make a choice (and remember in the study that this was an over 40 percent increase) outweighs the loss of those that don’t. In fact with the right type of incentives in place it should be feasible to significantly reduce the number of people who choose to do nothing and still reap the benefits that adding a ‘do nothing’ option has on subsequent commitment.

Despite the initial counter-intuitiveness of this approach there are many situations where persuading an individual to commit to, and then persist with a task or goal will be important. Whether you are a personal trainer persuading clients to persist with fitness programs, a nutritionist seeking sustained compliance to diet plans, or a business coach supporting an executive in the achievement of a professional goal, the introduction or highlighting of the ‘do nothing’ option could be a small change that makes a big difference to the outcome.

I’m sure that you, dear reader, will have opinions and comments of your own. You should feel free to email me directly with them or, if you prefer, you can post them in the comments section below.

Of course you could also do nothing!



Schrift, R. Y., & Parker, J. R. (2014). Staying the Course The Option of Doing Nothing and Its Impact on Postchoice Persistence. Psychological Science, DOI: 10.1177/0956797613516801.



  • James T Pereira

    Ok, I took the bait to not “do nothing”.

    I wonder if these results would also be applicable to buying choices. For example, if I were to submit a business proposal to a client and add a “do nothing” option, would it increase conversions?

    • NHFlyer

      I don’t think it would increase conversions on a business proposal, but if the client did select you and there was a do nothing choice, they would probably be more committed to using you and staying with you once they did select you.

    • joe michelotti


  • Warren Whitlock

    Thank you for giving me the option of doing nothing. I’m good that that and will go with my strengths

  • LiseVAN

    A series called “Years of Living Dangerously” about the disastrous impacts of climate change will be coming out in mid April. Because the images and stories are scare, the producers are inviting people to watch in a group and ALSO to sign a pledge identifying what they will do to help with the crisis. Think an option to “do nothing” is good here? – sounds like it might be! (Now I need to draw on my persuasion skills to get the producers on board!)

  • Saurabh Hooda

    This article has created a psychological pressure on me. I just read that “do nothing” makes people more committed. When I read “do nothing” in the last statement even when I don’t have anything substantial to add, am forced to participate (by commenting).
    I think this experiments is working :)

  • joe michelotti

    This is a great article. If you are talking to someone, they always have the choice to do nothing. If you offer them that choice, it cost you nothing , but they still have the same issues. If you solve their issue, it’s a win win.

  • Deborah Owen

    This is fascinating information! Would love to know how to use this option with children, in a parenting situation. Ideas?

  • Shirley

    I think the choice of do nothing does increase the commitment to do it and do it right!
    When I finished reading I was committed.

  • Prithvi Raj

    Persuasion science is really interesting and counter intuitive. Didn’t think such a simple thing could bring results.

Subscribe to the
Submit your email below:

vPOP Live & Online

From you’re the comfort of your home or office, explore the psychology behind what drives us as humans and teaches us how to ethically move others in our direction. Click here to register now.

Share Your Thoughts

Help us help others by leaving your comments, insights, and reviews on This demonstration of “social proof” will benefit all.
Click below to read and leave current reviews on for:

Dr. Robert Cialdini’s Books

Twitter Updates